![]() While PFL legislation is not currently at the forefront of the federal policy agenda, there has been significant momentum in PFL implementation at the state level. Opponents of PFL worry that paid time away from work could lower employees’ attachment to their jobs, lead to discrimination against women (who are more likely than men to take leave), and impose substantial costs on employers. There is also growing interest in encouraging men to take leave, in an effort to promote gender equality both at home and in the labor market. Advocates credit PFL with encouraging career continuity and advancement for women and improving child and family well-being. history, both Democratic and Republican presidential candidates included paid leave proposals in their campaign platforms. During the 2016 election, for the first time in U.S. ![]() In recent years, however, PFL has entered the mainstream political debate. It is therefore perhaps not too surprising that the majority of working parents report that work-family balance is a significant challenge. But because of stringent eligibility requirements, less than two-thirds of the American workforce is eligible for the FMLA, with low-wage workers less likely to be covered than their higher-wage counterparts. does provide 12 weeks of job-protected unpaid leave through the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to qualifying workers. Moreover, only 14 percent of American private sector workers have access to PFL through their employers. Yet the United States is one of only a handful of countries in the world without any national PFL policy for new parents, and the only high-income country without one. Paid family leave (PFL) policies are designed to help new parents balance competing work and family responsibilities by providing them with time off from work with partial wage replacement to care for their newborn or newly adopted children or ill family members. More than half of all American mothers and fathers of infants are in the labor force. Stanford King Center on Global Development.Stanford Environmental and Energy Policy Analysis Center (SEEPAC).Stanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions (SCCEI).California Policy Research Initiative (CAPRI).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |